-Andrew
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Monday, October 29, 2012
Glitch Art in Post-Modern Perspective, Part 2- Linda Chang
Postmodernism
promotes the dematerialism of art, emphasizing the importance of the idea and
concept beyond what the audience can see or touch.[1] It erases the line of
formality and blurred the difference between high and low art, opening up the
possibilities of multiple interpretations based on individual’s perspective. As
the modern society gradually gains more dependence on technology, glitch art inherits
the postmodern concept and application and takes the failure in mechanical
process as a dematerialized form of digital art.
Duchamp’s
Fountain started a great controversy
on the function and standard of art. The
Postmodern tradition often uses readymades and duplication to “reduce the
aesthetic consideration to the choice of the mind, not to the ability or
cleverness of the hand.”[1] In the case of glitch art, computer replaces the
“hands” and creates the opportunity to alter the significance of aesthetic. Fundamentally,
glitches are errors mechanical process or algorithm calculation and normally
the failures are instantly discarded. However, from an artistic standpoint, the
glitches reveal the process happened behind each pixel on screen and
demonstrate the fragility and imperfection of technology.
Glitch
art challenges the computer to perform beyond the normal task, and further utilizes
it as both the tool and medium. The foundation of technology is composed of
both hardware and software, and artists usually modify these components to create
the glitch. In the data-bending process, the codes, which are parts of the
software, are modify and reconfigured into new visual representation. The
process of translating the codes from lines of characters into a new language in
visual form conveying the media itself. On the other hand, the glitches from
hardware failure directly display the physical damages through its inability to
perform. Both methods incorporate technology as the tool to represent of the
mechanism as itself, and the visuals from these artifacts usually have a
certain look due to the similarity in engineering. [2]
By
removing the precision that machines should achieve, British artist Ant Scott
demonstrated the essence of the technology itself without the standard and
expectation of its performance. Because the artist has no control over the
result of erring, the pixels in the final images are the representation of the
computer itself, without any manipulation by man. Scott observed the reaction
of his audience to his work, and had noticed that those who did not know the
source of the images enjoyed the works more than those who did.[3] It was the
perspective from the audience that made the difference between an image of
disjointed, abstract pixels with bright colors and the error message on the
screen representing failure. The message of the work is not embedded in the visual,
but in the audience’s understanding of the source and process that generated the
image. [4]
As
other movements in postmodernism such as video art and pop art, glitch art is expression
of the cultural attitudes and context without a standardized product. By
directly using the error as the message, glitch art experiments with the perceptive
on technology.
1.Margot
Lovejoy, Digital Currents: Art in the Electronic Age(Boston: Prentice
Hall, 2000), 45-52.
2. Dominic McIver Lope, A
Philosophy of Computer Art (London: Routledge, 2010), 3-5,111-113.
3. Iman Moradi, ed., Glitch: Designing Imperfection (New York : Mark Batty Publisher,
2009), 20-21.
4. Rachel Greene, Internet
Art (London: Thames & Hudson, 2004), 194.
Ant Scott. DEATHSTAR #01.
Ant Scott. CHROMA #01.
GlitchBot
href="http://bitsynthesis.com/glitchbot/" target="_blank">What is GlitchBot?
GlitchBot is a bot on Flickr that takes random pictures from the site and glitches them using a python code. It does one picture each day. Here are some of the pictures it took.
Disclaimer: Photos are © Flicker
GlitchBot is a bot on Flickr that takes random pictures from the site and glitches them using a python code. It does one picture each day. Here are some of the pictures it took.
Disclaimer: Photos are © Flicker
Monday, October 22, 2012
Nick Briz and Databending --Nancy Olivo
Of the many glitch artists contributing to glitch art theory, no one’s resume is as extensive as Nick Briz. Briz is an award-winning new media artist and a figurehead in the glitch art movement. He is the co-founder and organizer of the international GL.ITC/H conference that brought new media artists and theorists together. He is also a professor at the Institute of Chicago, teaching workshops and lectures on glitch art theory and practices. There is an aspect of Nick Briz’s work, which runs the gamut of open-source software to videos, that requires extensive knowledge and creative exploitation of a computer’s code.
Briz’s Glitch Codec provides the tools for databending and delves into a computer’s code to produce glitched visuals seen in his videos “Binary Quotes” and “A New Ecology for the Citizen of the Digital Age”. “Binary Quotes” and “New Ecology” (abv.) are experimental videoes made in a manner not too dissimilar to “The Wordpad Effect”. The binary code of the video was hacked into using hex editing software and then running the raw data through the default video program. [1] A hex editor is software that allows a user to access the binary of a file, since all digital file formats are a bunch of 0s and 1s. [2] The finished product has a ‘datamosh’ aesthetic, where moving subjects bleed into the foreground. Briz’s viewpoint is that the “glitch” we see is the visual language that the computer sees, since the perceived mistake is on the part of the user, not the computer. These videos are made in some part by utilizing software he created that is now available for download called the “Glitch Codec”.
The “Glitch Codec” is open-source, which means that everyone can download it and modify the code to their purposes. The actual codec is color-coded for the users’ convenience. The header instructs users to modify the pink codes, allowing users the ease of replacing numbers and letters of a digital file without completely destroying it. [1] The Glitch Codec Tutorial he created allows newcomers to make glitch art in a user-friendly environment. The ease in which users of the Glitch Codec are able to produce glitched videos isn’t possible without Briz’s expertise of script-coding.
Briz’s work deals with the appropriation of existing digital mediums to create something new and the accompanying tutorial presents the tools needed to produce them. A magazine interview with Briz reveals his preference for the process of glitch making.
“While the aesthetics are extremely important, playing multiple roles, they work in tandem with the technology and the (multiple) process[es].” [3]
A strong proponent for open-source software and accessibility, Briz believes that the user can create a relationship with the digital by tinkering with the data and take an active role in the public discussion of glitch art. Glitch art is a tool by which to learn and understand the digital. Rather than consuming new technology, Briz encourages viewers through his art to look at technology in a proactive light and create new and better things with it.
Nick Briz. "Binary Quotes". 2009
Nick Briz. "A New Ecology for the Citizen of A Digital Age". 2009
-------------------------
1. “GLITCH CODEC TUTORIAL”, n.d., http://nickbriz.com/glitchcodectutorial/.
2. "Hex editor - Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hex_editor (accessed October 22, 2012).
3. Sam Rolfes, “INTERVIEW: Nick
Briz (w/Quick Glitch Tutorial!),” JOIN▾THE▾STUDIO,
n.d., http://jointhestudio.com/2011/04/nick-briz-interview-glitch-tutorial/.
EDITED November 13th, 2012 1:55PM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)