With
the transition from the analog to the digital age, glitch art has become a
fascination of imperfection. Glitch art
embodies the disruption of the systematic flow of binary data, zeros and ones,
and focuses on the indeterminable outcome.
The mesmerizing imperfections of
a once seemly flawless structure reminds the viewer, that even behind our most
electronically complex devices, human error still exists. The key characteristic of glitch art is its
indeterminable reaction when exposed to a foreign bug. How far can the limits be pushed for the
result to still be considered glitch art?
Can traditional media or compsited fragments of glitched images be
manipulated to fit the specifications?
There
is a degree of control the artist has over the outcome of glitch art. Some art is purely accidental while other
glitch art can be meticulously provoked until a desired outcome is
reached. In each case unflawed data is
reappropriated though a glitch to give it new meaning. Glitch art is a recent development but
parallels can still be drawn to 20th century art forms. " Marcel
Duchamp’s ready-mades thematically tie together the reappropriation of an
object’s function with the recontexualized bug of a prepared game computer."
1 Duchamp put it best what he
said "...it was always the idea that came first, not the visual
example." 1 In the same
way his ready-mades were elevated to the dignity of a work of art, a digital
image, by simply rearranging code is technically the same data but repositioned.
Not
unlike cubism, glitch art puts emphasis on fractured objects and the
two-dimensionality of the canvas. But
because there is no set rule book for what is considered glitch art and what is
not, it is often left up to the artist to define a set of constraints to work
under. A practiced glitch-artist and
mathematician, Tony Scott, favors experiments in spontaneity, absolutes, or
studies in form, color, or shape.2
He makes an important point when asked about the abstract nature of his
art: "I do change the colours of the glitches (to make them fit my warped
sense of aesthetic), but I never edit the structure, other than cropping and
stretching horizontally or vertically.
Remember, you cannot have half a pixel!" 2
A
common motif with glitch art is a preliminarily structure which is then
modified. I think it is safe to place a
general constraint on the genre that glitch art cannot simply be created from
nothing (e.g. drawing or painting), but must modify a preexisting source. Altering
the outcome to the extent Scott described is deemed acceptable because it
aesthetically enhances an already glitched image by altering data values, and
at the same times retains the corrupted composition of data.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Donaldson, Jeff. "Glossing over Thoughts
on Glitch. A Poetry of Error." Art Pulse, .
http://artpulsemagazine.com/glossing-over-thoughts-on-glitch-a-poetry-of-error
(accessed October 7, 2012).
2. Downey, Jonas. University of Illinois,
"Glitch Art." Accessed October 7, 2012.
http://jonasdowney.com/workspace/uploads/writing/glitch-art-jonasdowney.pdf.
This is a very interesting post, I have heard about glitch art before but I have never really learnt about it. So based on this post, a glitch art cannot be produced from nothing but it has to be a result of an previously glitched image; however, since an artist has to exposed it to a foreign bug to create an unknown reaction to the art, doesn’t that means that someone has to make the glitched image to begin with? If not, how can an artist get an already glicthed image? Thank you for choosing this topic, I trust this blog will help me understand and appreciate glitch art beyond the little knowledge that I posses about it now.
ReplyDelete